Niko House Claps Back After Being Smeared By Anti-Tulsi Reporter
In a hit-piece written by Charley Davis and published in The Huffington Post, Niko House, a progressive YouTuber and political commentator, is lambasted as a conspiratorial "fringe-left" supporter of Tulsi Gabbard. In a response published by Niko House, he breaks down the "conspiracy theories" he is accused of advocating, while calling out the motives, and the narratives, of those who have "literally built their careers on lying on anti-war voices".
Niko House minced no words on May 27th, publishing a rebuttal to a hit-piece published in The Huffington Post by Charley Davis, who listed a series of what he referred to as "conspiracy theories", and other instances where House has been "...a passionate critic of the official narrative". Niko embraced the accusation, stating, with regard to his disagreements with official narratives, "Yeah. Yeah, 100%. On most major news events, he would be correct about that," House referred to Charley Davis, as he opened his rebuttal, as "a known smear-merchant" and a "serial liar", unapologetically stating that "This is the type of nonsense that Ana Kasparian was trying to push to smear Tulsi", adding that "...somehow, she still believes she has a shred of credibility, when she is
quoting people, and using the same logic as people who have literally built their career around lying on anti-war voices". "Home of progressives!", He joked, referring to the company's iconoclastic slogan. But he wasn't done dismantling the accusations of conspiracy theorism, as he continued to discuss the now thoroughly debunked "Russiagate" narrative, delving also without flinching into Seth Rich, the Syrian gas attacks, and other establishmentarian talking points used by mainstream outlets to manufacture our consent for endless war.
quoting people, and using the same logic as people who have literally built their career around lying on anti-war voices". "Home of progressives!", He joked, referring to the company's iconoclastic slogan. But he wasn't done dismantling the accusations of conspiracy theorism, as he continued to discuss the now thoroughly debunked "Russiagate" narrative, delving also without flinching into Seth Rich, the Syrian gas attacks, and other establishmentarian talking points used by mainstream outlets to manufacture our consent for endless war.
|
With the mainstream press scrambling (this only being one of multiple occasions) to degrade and delegitimize a progressive candidate, I asked Niko House why a candidate that they (CNN, MSNBC, et al) register at a mere 1% in the polls was worth their time, to attack her, and progressive YouTube commentators supporting her. His response was skeptical of the polling; "Oftentimes political parties have internal polls that do not get reported because it does not favor their narrative. So it is likely that their internal polls have Tulsi much higher than the polls they are showing to the public."
|
Oftentimes, polling is conducted in such a way as to obfuscate those who may present opposing viewpoints, to his justification. In Biden vs. Sanders polling, for instance, we see polling conducted via landline calling. This will no doubt reach older, establishmentarian-minded individuals, and avoid talking to disenfranchised millennials and Gen X voters disenfranchised with the current political system. This results in polling favorable to the template being relayed, and, while it buries candidates such as Sanders, and particularly Gabbard in this case, they find themselves calling out their own narrative, as they somehow view it as nonetheless worth their time to smear a candidate they previously claimed was polling at 1%. We see you, establishment. We see you.